Current nascent criticism of anarchy is probably that it looks at the conditions where maximum sane and good things happen and then imagines these conditions are implementable from the outset as praxis rather than themselves the outcome of complex factors beyond human control.
-
-
I keep coming back to poker but essentialized hierarchical notions are like believing that playing a range of AA-KK, AQs hyper aggressively and the same exact way always is optimal, whereas non-essentialized heirarchy is knowing and playing the full range of +EV hands dynamically
-
There may still be unfortunate bullets to bite in that some "hands" are -EV. Long term there's no way around it, we have to find ways to transmute the one into the other, and hopefully those are least intrusive options like mind machine interface. But it's a very wide range now
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.