If the epistemological possibility of truth is going to be destroyed is it more stoic to complain or not complain?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
There's infinite room for the unfalsifiable. There's also infinite room for the ontologically superfluous, which may be the same thing. The problem is, once you've introduced the ontologically superfluous and made it credible, what happens? Maybe politics crushes truthseeking.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It makes a difference for the subjective experiences of, say, people being simulated according to unfalsifiable models.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.