You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Models supersede each other by explaining outliers in addition to everything else. But, the closer your model gets to entirely correct (explaining every instance of evidence), the more it will tend to dismiss freak occurrences of contrary evidence.
The growth in ability to test in volume has so far mostly outrun this problem, but it's conceivable there will eventually come a point where the inexplicable outliers of the reality we live in simply can't be tested in volume sufficient to give verisimilitude to new models.
Models based on personal experience that seem miscalibrated to reality may in fact represent superior models in such cases where they have equal predictive power in respect to the bulk of normal cases. But constructing such a model depends on faith in the senses.
Science has rarely impressed me because the experiences that have most strongly defined my life have mostly occurred outside of its reach. Occultism at one time impressed me because it is willing to begin with outside premises and work in, and this sometimes yields rewards.
If I had to live in a world where epistemology is derived from scientific process and one where it is derived through occult process (for lack of a better word), I would of course choose scientific process, but it also wouldn't be for my own sake, nor do I think I would last long
I own that most of my experiences are not valid foundations of anything, but some are, even if this truth is inexplicable according to the models with the most verisimilitude.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
