The Legendary Dragon Alephwyr, named Alephwyr, BA

*Cannot* emphasize this enough. Instead you can 1) counter fascist narratives and claims on your own, from afar in a distinct venue, NEVER making it a "conversation", and 2) engage them in private one-on-one, not in online "debate" for screencaps, but providing avenues out. https://twitter.com/KHandozo/status/1345857723502497793 …

This is the absolute minimum for antifascism, the absolute minimum expectation for all anarchists. We do not get into twitter threads debating whether white people have a "telekinesis gene", we don't go on the fucking BBC to talk it out. We block, we mock, we critique from afar.

Is it ok if I make a video game in which people debate fascists, or is that just smuggling in the debate itself?

I mean it *could* be a decent way to beat up on fascists, but far more likely are you to run afoul of the "can't parody fascism" dynamic whereby, okay cool, 99% of your audience realizes the fash is a dopey fool. That just means you convinced 1% of your audience to be fascists.

Right but I intend to make a series of five games, so it would be 0.01 * 0.01 * 0.01 * 0.01 * 0.01

That's not how it works. The, for lack of a better word, stupidest motherfuckers in any audience are going to agree with the straw-fascist every fucking time, so repeatedly beating up a straw-fascist only creates fascists.