You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Based on precious minutes of research, it seems like anarchism allows everyone to individually decide ex post facto whether they're going to honor the outcome of a game or agreement, which is something I severely dislike as a person nobody enjoys being defeated by.
I mean I guess it still resolves itself in the long run as people who don't keep their agreements being excluded, but in my experience it can also lead to people who expect their agreements to be kept being excluded instead while everyone else does stupid normie social allocation
Like "This person wins too much, let's not invite them any more", then they take turns losing to each other according to byzantine circuitous rules of politeness and "common sense", then "If only we could leverage that selfish winner's winnings into our bullshit allocation modes"
And I don't mean by this that there is some special class of winners or anything, though the pattern may zero in on an individual or group for either small or extended periods of time. I just mean, why the fuck couldn't I play video games without someone whining from 2006-2008.
It's just bad to eg adopt communism, a system that reliably kills millions, for the sake of trying to orthogonalize outside the system of competition. Yes, you're losing the game. No, there isn't a different game.Yes, you're introducing chance. Chance is LESS like justice/profit
Every Kulaks corpse is a roll of the dice to these people and they know they're playing against a house advantage but they still play. Fuck them in not only the macrocosm but also in every microcosm they manifest this behavior in.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
