You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Is this a paradox or am I stupid? 1. The odds of a subsequence of events varying from expected frequencies of a larger sequence increases as the bigger sequence approaches infinity. 2. Induction assumes a persistent sequence 3. As lindy-ness increases, it becomes self-refuting
If you flip an infinite number of coins you will eventually get any arbitrary number of just heads in a row. The more coins you are able to flip, the more likely you are to be able to flip an infinite number of coins. Therefore the less likely your data is to conform to truth??
Yeah. Basically if we're part of infinite anything it's infinitely more likely that we're in a pocket of improbability than it would be if we were only part of finite anything. Probability seems to break down in some way with infinite sequences even as it invokes them.
sure!
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
