My disposition is similar to a Buddhist's in this regard. I don't believe that the existence of spirits or even gods, even a creator god, has any relevance to what my own spiritual project should be.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I don't understand the question. I'm not a buddhist, I just said I shared one thing in common with them.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
They're constantly changing. As of now I suppose I am a simulationist panpsychist/pantheist with mathematical platonist characteristics.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Consciousness is an innate property of matter. Only humans, animals, perhaps plants, and maybe more complicated things like stars are self-aware though. God is the foundational truth which both supersedes and succeeds everything finite, giving it its foundation and destiny both
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Alephwyr @nofapasapbob and
God is not a person, more like the constraints and foundations within which everything occurs, as well as the external immortal truth which engenders them. God might also be thought of as a kind of optimal strategy or disposition within these constraints.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
I guess I just get the sense that the various proofs of God, if not insufficient on their face, prove something much more limited than their promoters think. IE, no good argument for a god proves the existence of the Christian God specifically, or a personal god, and so on etc.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.