So who is doing the sending? And who is asking this question?
-
-
Oh that's simple. I have no idea.
1 reply 4 retweets 164 likes -
You can't convince me that GPT3s "convincing looking nonsense" is substantively different from an occultists "convincing looking nonsense" though, this is just human chauvanism
0 replies 0 retweets 27 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @ProdigalBanana @nofapasapbob and
Sure, but not here. Here we practice nonsense.
1 reply 0 retweets 13 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @ProdigalBanana @nofapasapbob and
The Legendary Dragon Alephwyr, named Alephwyr, BA Retweeted The Legendary Dragon Alephwyr, named Alephwyr, BA
The Legendary Dragon Alephwyr, named Alephwyr, BA added,
The Legendary Dragon Alephwyr, named Alephwyr, BA @AlephwyrThis is basically my answer to the cosmogony question of how something can come from nothing, that math itself bootstraps itself from its contradictions (and then perhaps eventually collapses back into them). Don't ask me to explain because I don't really know, it's just a graph pic.twitter.com/c0wExzGuyZShow this thread1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Logically all systems are either contradictory, circular, or infinite. Nothing is finite. Therefore nothing is contradictory. This contradiction engenders regress, which is creation. Meanwhile everything remains bound together by circularity at the limits.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @ProdigalBanana @nofapasapbob and
Because the null set is finite in mathematics
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.