Basically I think it just means that reality is a graph with three basic operations: expand(owing to infinite regression/progression), refer (owing to circularity), and perhaps negate (owing to contradiction). I don't know why I think this, it's stupid and probably wrong.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Like I've literally just reified the Münchhausen trilemma into a metaphysics instead of taking it as a paradox. Also I'm missing a first movement where nothing negates itself, and I don't think the collapse if it happens refers back to this initial state but to the second state.
Show this thread -
Sort of an expansion of this, which began as a joke but has given me more and more impressions. Calling them "ideas" seems excessive, but images in my head maybe.pic.twitter.com/ElfFc6mAQj
Show this thread -
"Quae est negatio nihil ponit operationem scriptor" says google translate with all its encumbent authority
Show this thread -
(It's supposed to mean "nothing's negation implies everything's operation" but I think it came out wrong)
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Deep cosmic wisdom, gleaned no doubt through keen mystical insight. It seems the dragon's treasure is not only in gold, but in knowledge as well.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.