I guess more broadly, why do intellectuals in general insist on finding passing resemblances between arguments they encounter in the wild and academic arguments, then refuting the academic argument with a canned response? Isn't this just a straw man with extra pretension?
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.