Even bad people have rights, but from a game theory perspective it is sometimes important that members of outgroup get shot to death, to raise their frequency estimation of the number of armed ingroup, and so it's a tremendous bonus if the deceased was asking for it.
But midwit and high IQ groups can signal disrespect for rights also, requiring sometimes bloody adjustment
-
-
The functionality of tit for tat erodes as epistemic uncertainty increases, so the death of consensus reality bodes poorly for such finely tuned solutions unfortunately.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.