This is how “scientists” kidnap poetry & put it to use in the production of ideological invention— “memes are ONLY like genes” — akin to the analytical philosopher’s “science fiction” SAW scenarios which he creates as “ethical puzzles” etc
-
Show this thread
-
Analogy is only discovering a comment category— “memes & genes are... universal replicators” (they reproduce themselves, woah, that’s a category). Another category they fit into— “words with two e’s”
1 reply 1 retweet 13 likesShow this thread -
“Meme theory” is just how you explain “influence” to people who have never engaged with the history of culture. The “hopeful monsters” hypothesis applied from genes to memes is just a scientismic model of “the prophet” or “the poet.”
2 replies 1 retweet 15 likesShow this thread -
“Memetic evolution” is just “poetic inspiration” or “intellectual development” writ large. If “memes” are tied directly to “genes” this means that Truth is not a legitimate category— there are only “meme communities that survive” & “meme communities that die”— lol
3 replies 2 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
This then brings into question “Is the memetic-genetic hypothesis a meme community which survives or dies” as the criterion for “truth”— & this is how you smuggle irrationalism into what ostends to be Purely Rational— shell game con artistry abounds.
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likesShow this thread -
So ironically if the Social Darwinists are just killed off by Religious Fundamentalists— then it’s proof that Social Darwinism is a worthless meme lmao
3 replies 0 retweets 12 likesShow this thread -
Once you eliminate the concept of Truth as being anything but a “word we use to approve of certain memes in a social game”— then the only criterion is Power.
1 reply 0 retweets 16 likesShow this thread -
If Power is the only criterion, then there is no Truth at all & everything is purely relativistic & “faith based meme communities” are all equally valid. Of course, this is never expressed openly by the “scientists”
2 replies 1 retweet 7 likesShow this thread -
Nietzsche said this quite openly though. It’s the total sum of his thought. Foucault follows him on this entirely. So the people bemoaning “relativism” while then talking about “bioleninism” are just hypocrites on a fundamental level. (Hypocrisy might be a very FIT meme tho lol)
1 reply 1 retweet 13 likesShow this thread -
Nietzscheans bemoaning “cultural relativism” are everywhere & it’s hilarious.
3 replies 1 retweet 7 likesShow this thread
It solves Popper's problem of the inherent meaninglessness of speech under the nightmare of the physical determinist, by replacing truth with efficacy and robustness. Such "truths" can only be relative, but relative to environment. They have process validity, not ontological.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.