Thanks for helping to write the dialog for my second game, this is exactly what I was looking for
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @KBULTRA0 @Logo_Daedalus and
I have to make it sound a bit more schizo-off-the-meds though because that's Peter's character
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @KBULTRA0 @Logo_Daedalus and
Can I also get your insight into: * How a Jack Parsons/Philip K Dick would argue with a random stoic-flavored Roman aesthetic appropriating Trad * How they'd argue with a sadistic nihilist academic well versed in Chinese and Indian philosophy * With a communist * w/ antinatalist
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I also need detailed notes on the agreements and disagreements of the following esoteric systems/philosophies: Chaos Magick <> UR group style magick, CCRU group magick, slavic folk magick, wicca, esoteric tantric buddhism, and an anti-natalist take on chaos magick
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Basically the whole premise of game two is pseud genius dragons arguing hyperaggressively in a world that survived a nuclear apocalypse, so they are reading books at random and establishing really weird autodidact worldviews. Each boss battle starts with 5^5 branching arguments.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I could give you a reading list of the esoteric texts I've read I really just need your autism to details
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Did you get a chance to read all the stuff I posted in the 100 tweet reply chain the other day?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Anyway, if you don't want to work on it it's your loss really. It's only the greatest game series ever conceived. I will find willing participants eventually.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
(or a way to coerce unwilling participants)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.