Thanks for helping to write the dialog for my second game, this is exactly what I was looking for
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Can I also get your insight into: * How a Jack Parsons/Philip K Dick would argue with a random stoic-flavored Roman aesthetic appropriating Trad * How they'd argue with a sadistic nihilist academic well versed in Chinese and Indian philosophy * With a communist * w/ antinatalist
-
-
I also need detailed notes on the agreements and disagreements of the following esoteric systems/philosophies: Chaos Magick <> UR group style magick, CCRU group magick, slavic folk magick, wicca, esoteric tantric buddhism, and an anti-natalist take on chaos magick
-
Basically the whole premise of game two is pseud genius dragons arguing hyperaggressively in a world that survived a nuclear apocalypse, so they are reading books at random and establishing really weird autodidact worldviews. Each boss battle starts with 5^5 branching arguments.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.