person-intentions *are* “organic”, tho- it is in people’s natures to transform the world (including making new kinds of meaning-makers/people)
-
-
Replying to @averykimball
True. I guess I just mean that I think broad opt in is better than a specific rigid vision imposed from above (though the CTCR is my version of that too)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Alephwyr
gotta have a start point or nothing begins doesn’t need to be *one* start point, but creation is a concrete and specific thing an essential description would be that start point- organic evolution and transformation would follow
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @averykimball
Again, the CTCR was intended to serve that purpose, but nobody bit. Dragons + politics seems pretty easy but nobody wants to meme with me I guess
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Alephwyr
aaaahhhh I remember something about that what are the implementation details
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @averykimball @Alephwyr
though, a lot of it sounds straight forward, the dragon bits don’t seem obvious
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @averykimball
That would be easier to articulate visually but I cannot into art, lol
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @averykimball
The closest thing I ever had to an aesthetic vision was my games, but those will likely never be made
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Just the concept art, the pitch documents, and my general notes so far, in addition to a couple of failed prototypes. I am probably just going to try to survive until gpt-4 or 5 and dictate them
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.