This is bad because each time you “get away with” a transgression against a moral principle, your faith in the principle is weakened. If there are too many safety nets, this creates a moral illusion: that sin does not exist
Show this thread
-
The only sin under liberalism is having a moral code, (the only sin is being a man) and it makes the same rotten argument over and over: “you sinned and nothing bad happened, right? Your moral code is the problem!”
Show this thread
The only way to preserve adaptiveness at time n+1 is to preserve error at time n. Extends to imply both something preserved and something that preserves: though they must of course change places periodically else incoherent. It's all sin. You don't hate sin, you hate what's easy
-
-
I hate people who are hardwired to do what's wrong, who can't overcome it by will and volition. But if what they were hardwired to do was always wrong, they wouldn't be hardwired to do it.
-
Though perhaps right now you are angry because you are the error and you are not being preserved
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.