"If people are different then that's a hierarchy, checkmate anarchists" = truly the most lazy dipshit line conservatives have. 1) Difference is not domination. What we oppose is relationships that constrain net choice. "Social hierarchies" are not any axis of difference.
Perhaps they shouldn't lead to capital advantages. Perhaps they should be abolished as differences, and anyone should be able to become as strong or smart or fast as they want. But to say they should be stripped of their implications is like saying 2 + 2 "should" equal 5.
-
-
Also, if they become purely volitional, then so too do their consequences. You can't be angry at losing a footrace for instance when you have it within your power to simply attach better legs.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
that... is not at all what i'm saying? the point is that in a truly just and equal society each person if not most people will have some advantage over another, they will use these to help the community, but it won't substantially negatively impact their ability to live.
-
That's fine then
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.