What's nonsensical about it? If you can't predict in advance what makes a winner, you can't have a set of moral axioms that lionize winners in any sort if essentialist sense. Because if there was such a thing as always already being a winner, you could just plan the economy
Capitalism doesn't decide on winners and losers based on alleged first principles, it just runs the scenario and what happens happens. Which means all rationalizations of capitalisms outcomes are ex post facto. Which means Ayn Rand is lying to herself about logic's role in things
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.