Did I ever show you the axiom of teleological recurrence? It's a mathematical sophistry/verbal tilt math failure wrapped in occult nonsense that I incidentally wrote at a time I was psychotic.
-
-
There should be an equal sign between the first omega sub(z) and the rest of the formula but yeah, this was my idea of an abuse of math that looked cool and sort of references occult stuff, which is all I figured crowley's 0=2 for at the time.
-
THE PRINCIPLE OF EXPLOSION ONLY STATES -THAT- EVERYTHING FOLLOWS FROM A CONTRADICTION. WITH MY SUPERIOR GRASP OF MATHEMATICS I HAVE DEMONSTRATED -HOW- EVERYTHING FOLLOWS FROM A CONTRADICTION.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.