If you make me decide between markets and a specific group's interests I choose markets. It's also an absolutely ludicrously insane choice to try to force someone to make. * Redistribute property? OK * Destroy property? Not ideal but understandable. * Abolish property? LOL NO
-
The traditional formula for property rights is unclaimed resource + labor. So, if you work a parcel of land, it becomes yours. By this logic we can trace back ownership fairly well, it would just also require things like giving native americans back significant amounts of land
