Join "food not bombs" then
-
-
Replying to @Alephwyr
seems redistributionary, not actually a solution i’d just do Effective Altruism if i wanted to trick myself into thinking i’m solving problems
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @averykimball
Economics consists of wealth creation and wealth redistribution, right? There's not some sort of third thing? Either make as much money as possible and do effective altruism, or make the infrastructure that makes better effective altruism possible. Seems comprehensive
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @averykimball
That doesn't seem like a valid axiom to me. Do you mean state redistribution specifically? That could be argued, but isn't what I'm talking about.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Alephwyr
no, simple “as needed” distribution, without any kind of telos or plan anything the contemporary left might endorse *only makes social problems worse* because they have institutions to perpetuate the test is: can the left stomach it? If yes, it will perpetuate poverty
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @averykimball
Ah, I see. You're talking about the way "charitable" orgs tend to become bloated and useless sinecure programs for administrators. That's true too, but I think the grassroots orgs run by the far left are probably different than the orgs run by state liberals.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Alephwyr
no, grassroots orgs are *also* institutions, and have no actual criteria for success that would obsolete them- “poverty” is perpetual, and the perpetuation is poverty is necessary for the activist identity, who people those orgs they *perpetuate* poverty
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @averykimball
That seems like magical thinking, the confusion of cause and effect. I don't think it's always untrue but if you can't identify a credible mechanism it's not a good enough explanation to universalize
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Alephwyr
eh, i can’t find a better explanation for why lefty orgs don’t try to actually solve the problems, rather than question their shitty assumptions and create real solutions that would end reduce or end poverty the best they can do is obtuse turn-of-two-centuries-ago class analysis
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Perhaps the barrier is ideology. Ideology has to be accessible, truth doesn't. This would still be merely a failure to solve poverty, not a cause of it. Though I see why you"d be confused, since "maintain ideological identity" is a potential credible motive for causing poverty.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.