no, your argument seems to be.
-
-
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @NegarestaniReza
All Reza's 'arguments' end up as nebulous appeals to authority. "Experts agree mumble mumble."
3 replies 0 retweets 45 likes -
... They're designed to intimidate, rather than to educate. That's why no one would ever go to him to learn something about the world, unless how to survive the bitchiest kinds of intellectual micropolitics.
4 replies 1 retweet 41 likes -
... It comes from a diseased subculture of volunteer academic policemen.
1 reply 0 retweets 27 likes -
... Crushing headline: "Most senior professors say 'no' to Cosmic Darwinism." Cosmic Darwinism remains shockingly unintimidated.
1 reply 1 retweet 33 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I've experienced the same basic gnosis, but with dragons
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Alephwyr @NegarestaniReza and
The only thing immediately wrong with Land is that he treats Darwinism as some sort of game condition that a strategy can be calibrated to, in the same basic way that hermetics or gnostics thought you could achieve ascension by aligning your will with the will of the true God.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Alephwyr @NegarestaniReza and
eg market darwinism becomes the "that which is above is like that which is below" to cosmological darwinism. But cosmological darwinism can't possible care and in the long run kills everyone anyway most likely. Identification with God earns no reprieve from him.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Replying to @m1csn @NegarestaniReza and
That's true and good and I also don't think I've ever seen anyone use Amor Fati pejoratively before which is a very weird thing to do
4:08 PM - 16 Feb 2020
1 reply
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.