Having the right to carry a gun to protect against private citizens who will set you on fire and then stab you 67 times is not substantively different from not being allowed to carry a gun (but still having access to one) to protect against state actors who will do the same.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.