What's confusing?
-
-
-
Replying to @heirofavians
I believe there are aspects of reality, analogous to and probably derived from physical or mathematical laws, that afford only a limited amount of leeway in terms of social and economic systems. Therefore short of metaphysical rebellion, impractical advocacy serves no purpose.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Good argument. I didn't say there wasn't leeway though, only that there was a limited amount. Hence why attempted implementations of communism in the past all deviate more severely from their ideal than implementations of capitalism do from theirs.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Alephwyr @chinese_with
I feel like Adam Smith would disagree
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @heirofavians @chinese_with
I haven't read Adam Smith, or for that matter any of the classical economists.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I am not familiar with mondragon, or much socialist literature or thought. Anarcho-capitalism is aspirational for me. I think a number of fundamental technological and social developments would have to happen to make it remotely tenable. Presently, all systems tend to corruption.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Replying to @OrbitalButt @chinese_with
There are books besides yours
9:26 AM - 31 Dec 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.