"Range of action" should replace "Free will" "Tendencies of action" should replace "Personal responsibility" "Proportionate entitlement" should replace "Equal opportunity" "Fundamental entitlement" should replace "Human rights" In all cases, the logic is that of human nature.
-
-
Show this thread
-
The concept of equal opportunity is especially pernicious since it is basically just a blank check for those in power to enforce their subjectivity regardless of its logic or consequences. If there is external right and wrong then virtue comes from following external standards.
Show this thread -
The concept of equal opportunity is inherently nihilist in that it refuses the possibility of such external standards. In a broader sense, markets themselves are nihilistic by the same logic. But at least markets mediate interests where otherwise impossible.
Show this thread -
Equal opportunity is a ritualistic sham wherein the competent are periodically sacrificed to the incompetent to appease the egregore of mass public delusion about self-worth. There may be some utility in that, but even then it should optimally be done randomly, not preferentially
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.