You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
The basic premise of "family" is that parents have the right to decide what happens to their genes. Which would be true, if those genes weren't attached to a conscious being. Being a child is being shanghai'd into a license agreement to utilize/propagate someone else's genes.
Certain reciprocation is made both as a direct exchange and as concession to the inequality and coercion of the relationship. But the nature of the "contract" is rarely made explicit, which is unfortunate, partly intrinsically, partly because it prevents exceptional nullification
How are they "someone else's genes"? The child's genes are their own. You're trying to wedge a gap between a conscious being and their own genes by saying that their own genes are in fact, not their own.
A child has their genes before they are conscious. Whose genes are they at that point, when they are just a fetus without brain cells? The essential concept of property tends to associate it with labor plus owned material, which can be applied with few gynmastics to reproduction.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
