Maybe for you all of this is a desirable state of affairs, probably because you are a person who controls a lot of resources or has some hope that you will be one of the few who wins the lottery of this system and you don't care that much about other people
-
It's clear that our current setup with private land ownership and private development doesn't service people's needs in practice, and in theory we shouldn't be surprised since most people's needs aren't taken into account.
I support Andrew Yang and UBI personally: Capitalism where income doesn't start at zero. I think that is a reasonable adjustment based on the situation you are describing.
-
-
I don't think UBI is necessarily bad, but just giving people $1000/mth doesn't change much about who makes decisions about what we use our productive resources on
-
I think it's better to start by giving everyone the things we know we need (e.g., health care, a home) which adds up to a lot more already and then to start reorganizing society to make decision-making more democratic
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.