This is pretty clearly on display in how the climate crisis is being handled, where the vast majority are being screwed over for the benefit of a small group who because of their access to resources will be able to insulate themselves from it while they live.
-
How do you mean? We already have built enough homes in LA for everyone to have one, they were just given to people who didn't need them.
This seems a bit naive. As a homeless person, there were times when I passed up housing opportunities because they weren't compatible with work or with other basic requirements of living. Houses also depreciate without maintenance. It's possible some houses are "too much house"
-
-
Ok, so then we can dedicate more resources to making sure we build housing that's adequate for people's needs.
-
Good idea. I tend to think the market is best at allocating resources. If it even isn't, I tend to think this is the fault of government intrusion in some other context. If you can prove to me that both of those are false in this context then that's fine I guess.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.