Feudalism makes the rules of society more explicit and legible. Therefore, feudalism benefits people who benefit from the rules of society being explicit and legible, and harms those who benefit from the rules of society being opaque. Much follows from this.https://twitter.com/Alephwyr/status/1198720602250473472 …
-
-
Replying to @izmeckler
Feudalism is probably superior to most forms of tribalism. Capitalism is probably superior to most forms of feudalism. If you have something better in mind, the onus is on you to prove it, in theory or in practice. I'm not confident anyone has done so in either case.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Alephwyr
Capitalism is a system where the stuff needed for production (factories, computers, raw materials, etc.) is owned by a small group, and the rest of the population has to sell their labor to that group in order to gain access to necessities resulting from production.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @izmeckler @Alephwyr
Having a small, largely hereditary group control production is certainly one way to run a society, but there are many other ways we could instead. We could have those doing the work control the means of production, keep markets in place in certain sectors, plan directly in others
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I haven't read very much Marxist literature, so to be honest I'm unable to address it in any depth. But if it could be done, one would think it would have been done, and the arguments for forces that prevent this from being true have always struck me as excuses.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.