Anarcho capitalism is theory without action, held largely by people who are good at the games that exist now. Anarchism otherwise is mostly action without theory, held largely by people who are bad at the games that exist now.
Is AnCap praxis even possible? It seems like by nature it tends to collapse into either broader anarchist losing strategy or simple authoritarian-complacency. The best that can be said for AnCap praxis is that it consists of "waiting for the right shot".
-
-
So it seems to me the difference between AnCap non-praxis and AnCap praxis is just some sort of definition of optimal risk taking with different levels of capital: IE, Sklansky Chubukov number style considerations for the very poor and ICM style considerations for the very rich.
Show this thread -
This burdens the poor, but in a spiritual sense it also means the poor get a bigger share of meaningful participation in history, while the rich are chained to their obligations to tend to their capital. And it is an obligation, because wealth is primary to wealth distribution
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.