Look, all I'm saying is that if it's considered unfair but optimal for people at the bottom of a society to die because they're interchangeability lowers their wages to the point they're not insulated against chance, let's extend that unfairness but optimality universally
Axiomatically, nobody accumulates massive wealth because they want to buy things, otherwise they would spend the money and thus not have it. So the accumulation of massive amounts of capital is fundamentally about the externalities of capital, such as power.
-
-
So give the rich more power and at the same time more responsibility and risk. Not only does this approach illusory "fairness" in terms of introducing comparable risks at both the top and the bottom of society, it would actually work.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Some accumulate it because they want to build things. Like Martian cities, or seasteads. If you want to soak the rich, tax their luxury items so they're better of spending it on awesome stuff. A 100% sales tax on super yachts, perhaps.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.