It really seems like the issues stemming from application of HBD evidence to scientific racism come from accepting "most" as a valid standard instead of the harder to define but more valuable "nearly all". You go broke in poker if your all-in standard is winning most of the time.
Similarly, you wouldn't need to lay very big odds to bankrupt a racist who was willing to bet on the proposition "this randomly selected person of x demographic has an IQ below the average for y demographic"
-
-
The implications for business hiring decisions should be obvious since they are basically the same bet. QED
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.