One approach to morality is to decide that we can only control our own actions. So it's best to do no wrong oneself, even if that means one is incapable of affecting the actions of those doing wrong.
What are the pacifists of the world expecting to happen? For their opponents to spontaneously feel really guilty and collectively drop what they're doing? Or is pacifism just about feeling, like, metaphysically superior to other people who still destroy you in the physical realm.
-
-
-
So that's a virtue ethics approach to pacifism, which is fine. Probably there is very little that can effect anyone's actions either way, pacifist or non-pacifist. But if there is something that can effect other people's actions, and their actions are unfathomably bad, I dunno.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.