Yes. Some large percentage of the cognitive elite—probably nearly all—choose their mates in part because of considerations that amount to applied eugenics. The rightful horror at eugenics should be reserved for government compulsion. https://twitter.com/ExcludedMuddle/status/1022260393312309248 …
What's wrong with government compulsion? Is it ethical to intentionally have children who are une quipped for meaningful, valuable, quality life?
-
-
It is safer across governments to have a strong norm against govt compulsion in this to guard against it being especially horrific if govts get the policy wrong enough.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
before you write a law, ask yourself 'what would a fuckface do with this law'
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Perhaps. But I wouldn't want gov deciding what genes would result in my son living meaningfully.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.