More than meaning, truth, or power, people seek equilibrium with their surroundings. Ancient cultures viewed freedom as proceeding from character, while modern socities view it as proceeding from liberty. But liberty is experienced negatively, by the absence of imposition 1/9
-
-
Everyone yields to something: whether in other men or in nature, and, far from being free from pressure from the masses, those in positions of authority feel pressures from both above and below. But these pressures are inert forces to one who has accomodated them in their person
Show this thread -
The synthesis of ancient and modern freedom is an ideal enjoyed by very few, and in human societies, always belies a very specific character. Every nexus point of command in an ethological heirarchy is also a lagrange point of freedom. 7/9
Show this thread -
All "great men" are found at these intersections of great forces The rest of us are all, to some extent or other, torn apart by our respective gravities, and can only choose whether to reconcile themselves to their fate or not. 8/9
Show this thread -
Pay the obolus for liberty or retain it as a token of character: either way, someone is going to buy the damn lettuce, and someone else will be left with an obolus they can't exchange for it. Slave morality and its opposite are coequal forces in a system seeking equilibrium. 9/9
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.