I use probability heuristics to put my opponent on a range of arguments and then game theory to randomly determine how frequently to attribute each argument to them. My own arguments are a binary range of extremely strong and extremely weak arguments, to keep them guessing.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Not if my argument strategy is actually GTO, no. Optimally, you should be indifferent to engaging or not engaging my arguments if my ranges are properly selected.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
If you engage every argument then I have successfully tricked you into wasting substantial portions of your time. Not just that, this is a literally infinite hole; I could theoretically exploit it to waste infinite time.
- Show replies
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yeah, I was basically just applying Janda-esque poker theory to the realm of argumentation :p
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.