I use probability heuristics to put my opponent on a range of arguments and then game theory to randomly determine how frequently to attribute each argument to them. My own arguments are a binary range of extremely strong and extremely weak arguments, to keep them guessing.
You're forgetting folding equity: a bad argument pressed aggressively enough just becomes an incomprehensible or unfalsifiable argument, therefore obfuscating my actual range.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Not if my argument strategy is actually GTO, no. Optimally, you should be indifferent to engaging or not engaging my arguments if my ranges are properly selected.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.