1/ Hypothesis: The primary way that techy bicoastal millennials interact with the vast underclass of millions of hourly workers is in Uber cars. Riders talking to drivers. Uber is creating the forum for folks to learn about each other, and what we’re learning disappoints us
-
-
Whether this is a valid point depends on whether Uber drivers actually make enough to save anything. I have seen lots of evidence that they don’t. You can’t build a better future with subsistence wages.
-
Not really, I think. Uber/Lyft and other gig economy companies allow for much needed (and aspired to) flexibility. Doesn’t need to be the primary job. It can be a supplemental source of income.
-
But should we allow companies to build Billion dollar businesses on the premise that they never create a decent job for most of their “employees”? I’d say a hard no.
-
This is vulture capitalism at its worst. A small pool of high paid developers and executives, with investors extracting value from millions of low wage workers forced to accept more tenuous work conditions. It’s unethical.
-
I disagree. There are no forced conditions of labor. Drivers have freedom to change their line of work, reduce hours, or ignore ridesharing altogether. What’s unethical about having options?
-
1. Lure drivers in with bogus earnings expectations 2. Convince them to buy/lease cars 3. Continuously modify algorithms to extract more labor from drivers at lower payouts 4. Rely on combination of app gamification and driver debt to keep them driving 5. Sharecropping = success!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
That’s irrelevant though. We only think in absolutes and binaries these days and Uber is perpetually evil, per our ethical overlords
-
I’ve turned 180 on ridesharing- when you see real wages earned I think it’s really just an arbitrage play against the inability of most individuals to truly grasp total car costs. Otherwise Uber would just be a massive fleet company that owns vehicles and just hires drivers.
-
Kevin you are right. Read this poweful quote from
@mrmoneymustachepic.twitter.com/N1XpqAEOix
-
Sar you too. I hope you will someday realize that Uber is actually an exploitive company. They are literally paying hundreds of thousands of full time drivers less than minimum wage. It simply isn't right.
-
You can claim that those workers are ok with working for less, but the information asymmetry is what I think makes it unethical.
-
They aren't ok with getting paid below min wage. Just watch
#StrikeUberLyft this week. (And#AB5 after that)pic.twitter.com/rIs2R5ux7z
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They used to be able to come here and work as cabbies and make a decent living. The taxi industry is the most diverse and responsible for immigrant success stories than any industry in America Up until 2015, show me a cabbie with 2 kids and I'll show you 2 kids who go to college
-
The reason that regulators and politicians looked the other way or worse supported uber and lyft as they operated illegally while ruining cabbies is due to our demographics.pic.twitter.com/pbBzxFS8VT
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Bad take. The implication is that we should do nothing to make America a better place as long as there is greater suffering someplace else in the world.
-
You just summarized American exceptionalism. America is better than third world countries so thus we are the best.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They do.... and then quit and move on.... the retention rate is what it is and drivers around the globe aren't all wrong and stupid in taking action on the 8th.
#driversunite#strikeuberlyftThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
-
-
$30k medallion = $27k Prius financed by Uber?
-
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Born.