Even male kids? Circumcision is now evil? I'm sure there are always arguments about different things. But it's evil?
-
-
-
Why do you think it is not? Also, your question "Even male kids" suggests that you think that it is evil (or not good) for female kids but okay for male kids. Are you aware that some kids die as a direct result of this act?
-
Don't know much about female babies, I know it's discouraged. However for male babies, there are reasons (right ones) it's done. Some would argue against it - we can't all agree - but saying it's evil is a stretch. Babies die from childbirth too, we going to stop giving birth?
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Could you share some of these reasons that you are sure warrant the act on baby boys? Not hearsay or reasons passed down to you, but the ones you are certain of. Could you also try to look into why the act is discouraged for baby girls?
-
I'm not sure of anything. I can only read on the information available (& I'm not talking about what was passed down to me.. there are arguments for and against. What I can say is that, it's not evil.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
It would be nice if you could list some of the benefits, or reasons why it is not evil. You said you aren’t sure of anything, but you seem to be sure that it is not evil.
-
Benefits: A decreased risk of urinary tract infections. A reduced risk of some sexually transmitted diseases in men. Protection against penile cancer and a reduced risk of cervical cancer in female sex partners. 1/2
-
Take a second to think about statements like “reduced risks or increased risks”. They often start with statements like “studies show” or “medical experts agree than”. They are often unreliable stats.
@omon_ilaboya - 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Which? The male or female little ones?
-
All little ones, male and female.
-
I’d appreciate you share the reasons behind your views on the practice of male child circumcision being stopped.
-
1. It is an unnecessary medical procedure with known cases of permanent damage and death. This acts kills thousands of children per year. 2. Unmutilated male are doing just fine. 3 Like many other things, it was passed down to us, and many do it without asking why.
-
Lmao! Where are the stats, sir?

Like any surgical procedure, there are risks associated with circumcision but the risk is very low.
Pain, bleeding, infections, irritation of the glans and injury are common problems which have been medically corrected. -
-
I don’t get, I told you about how I relate with “stats”. You can’t take a sample of 500 people out of billions and come up with a generalization in the name of stats.
-
Your tweet here was why I asked for stats, bro. Emphasis on the highlighted words. I only needed to know what “studies” justified the numbers.pic.twitter.com/dbMSkaYTTy
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Painful? Yes. Evil? No.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Umm...evil act? I wouldn’t call it evil, though it has its risks but its health benefits outweigh the risks. The procedure is used to treat phimosis (the inability to retract the foreskin) or to treat an infection of the penis, esp in older males.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
by