Note that Bitcoin has a limited number of natural sellers. The entire concept is very concave supply (it costs more and more to extract). The number of producers shrinks with time.
-
-
Ok, go ahead and give some examples where a decentralized system is more efficient than a centralized one. Efficient - in the sense uses less energy, cheaper to produce etc..
-
Compare soviet system to modern mixed economy. You think you can centrally tell everyone what prices they should take? Good luck bb
-
You mistake robustness for efficiency. The Soviet Union achieved very fast economic development and became Super Power after a devastating war. All these thanks to centralized planning which is very efficient, but also very fragile. This is the tradeoff.
-
You are not counting survival as efficiency. Is it efficient to die? Over the long run it’s more efficient to survive right?
-
Companies rarely die, they just go bankrupt and sold to more efficient competitors. While every company is centralized, the market as a whole is decentralized. Making particular company decentralized is a huge cost, basically for nothing.
-
We are all entitled to our opinions and thoughts. I disagree with most of this statement and don't want to go back and forth. So I am going to gracefully bow out. Thank you.
-
Same, could talk for a while about how m&a rarely produces better companies, death of companies being replaced by better ones, etc. look at forest not trees etc. not worth my time.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.