I don’t think that’s true, maybe if you take what she says as a totalizing system...
Well most of them are not set within a political economy framework that advocates a more Austrian view over collectively controlled economies. As an economist that is interesting. There are also sacrificial themes with the railroad crash, etc.
-
-
I’ll let my economist friends tell me whether her views are bad economics (I’m told they are), but my job is to discern whether they’re bad morals. And they most definitely are.
-
And I think you are taking a pretty black and white view in something you clearly have cherry picked what you’ve read about. I’m not saying your wrong about what you are referencing, she is morally reprehensible sometimes, but not totally.
-
I guess I’m not as interested in whether she’s reprehensible so much as she’s completely incompatible with the teachings of Jesus. I can see how some of ideas might appear to make sense without Jesus’ teachings to contend with.
-
She is not COMPLETELY incompatible man you havnt even been reading what I’ve been saying or what Rand is saying. For a Princeton Seminary student I would think you had read Kierkegaard or the Bible
-
Some of one, all of the other.
-
I recommend “Works of Love” and “Purity if Heart is to Will One Thing”. Also I will say that where I find any author whatsoever to contradict the teachings of Jesus, I side with him. One should not be a James Taggert.
-
With Jesus, that is, particularly the sermon on the mount.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.