That's not the point. It's possible that sex is so dangerous that it has to be encapsulated within a socially-sanctioned construct.https://twitter.com/primalpoly/status/929179212631629824 …
-
-
I'm quite interested in this response. You're working ideas together in ways not often seen; the flow of concepts seems disjointed. I must assume that back of your words are conceptual associations amongst terms that make the last two sentences coherent.
-
Mostly that monogamy was probably better for a community because it prevents escalations in the use of violence in competition between rivals for mates. We have prohibitions on violence that allow us to have “free sex” but don’t free us from the violent competitive desire
-
Then why wasn't monogamy more pervasive?
-
Analogy: Honest speech is selected 4, b/c it promotes social cohesiveness & cooperative effort. As honesty grows more widespread, the benefits accrue 2 all & detection of cheaters becomes more difficult (for lack of alertness/inexperience w/cheaters), so risk of cheating declinespic.twitter.com/kXAb0j26z7
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"Social order is at stake"? It's too late.pic.twitter.com/oyZpyKfHJn
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.