If you wanna use that to ignore what some of us say then your loss.https://twitter.com/cognazor/status/1039139033891434496 …
-
-
I think the difference between anonymous and non-anonymous tweeting is that of playing poker with matchsticks and playing it with real money. In the former, both, extreme downsides and extreme upsides are taken away.
-
This is not a criticism. It's perfectly alright to play with matchsticks.
-
Maybe alright. The difference is twitter is an open system, and so the things you say matter to everybody. Playing with matchsticks and burning analogies coming.
-
We might be overestimating Twitter's ability to effect real life behavior. I'd say a negligibly small percentage of Twitter accounts affect any real change.
-
I'm not sure about that. Emergent behavior and all. Large accounts just steal from smaller accounts, and back down. Feedback loops. One little meme can have nonlinear interaction effects.
-
panarchy!
-
I wonder what
@KyleMetta thinks about panarchy. I seem to recall that he was trying to explain it to me once... -
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Same here baby.
-
but jason why u mad tho
-
I don't get mad I just crush a lot
-
what about this guys skin in the game ? https://twitter.com/Outsideness/status/1039340240228442115 … advocating for a repercussion of freedom of expression, sure is convenient when your tribe is in power. what about gay anonymous authors who avoided "skin in the game" to avoid persecution
-
Tweet unavailable
-
telling people you have no skin in the game but you yourself are not persecuted, or wont be due to the political climate is an example of no skin in the game he should try experimenting with being a devils advocate, see how itll affect his post docs
-
Touché
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.