"The seminal work of Andrew Meltzoff & Keith Moore (1977; 1983; 1989) has played a key role in changing the depth and scope of imitation research. In the process of testing Piaget's developmental stages of infant preverbal learning, Meltzoff and Moore (1977) unwittingly...
...the WHAT, and then proceed with the HOW (Meltzoff & Decety, 2003). In order to confirm that such behaviors were not the result of prior associative experience or reinforcement training, they repeated their study with newborns averaging 32 hours old, the...
-
-
...youngest being only 42 minutes old (Meltzoff & Moore, 1983, 1989). The results were the same, demonstrating that newborns possessed an innate ability to imitate in a way that could not be explained by conditioning or the triggering of innate responses." - Garrels, 2004
Show this thread -
What do you think about this in comparison to Piaget,
@jordanbpeterson ?Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.