Link to paper please. Most research reveals that when accounting for time off for child-rearing disparities disappear.
You must understand non-guassian distributions, particularly with respect to the fat tails. Additionally, a difference doesn’t tell us anything at all, we must know WHY and that is a multivariate analysis based that is reduced when taking into account what I’ve said above.
-
-
Additionally we must find multivariate reasons for the difference that are significant and then we must examine the second and third order effects of intervening in the natural self-selection that produces asymmetries.
-
Perhaps you should consider the expendability of men. How might men being expendable result in them taking up the extreme ends of sociological distributions in income, intelligence, education, etc.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.