Even though 1950's gender roles would probably end or fuck up countless more childrens' lives (no abortion, anti-divorce pressure prevents a wife from leaving an abusive husband, etc.)
Imagine a boat crashes on an island, and everyone elects you to lead them. It's more likely you'd be more careful about your decisions if your group consisted of strong men than weak children. It's a general 'fear' of the people you govern that modifies your choices.
-
-
Fine, but would you then predict that countries with armed populace have more careful leaders? A real world survey doesn't show this or even falsifies. So what do you base this belief on and is that enough justification to pay the high price of gun violence?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.