Would a factor 2-5 difference qualify as significant?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
some people are lazy and unproductive. others are motivated and productive.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Proficiency, hours worked, motivating and drive... There's no system to adjust for the people who have themselves put together compared to the one's who won't/can't unless you stop counting "work" as the means.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I guess it depends on whether if "inequality" means "uneven" or "unfair." I chose "yes."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Who are the 29% of people answering 'no'? Do they have economic and legal systems in mind which would eliminate inequality? Or do they just think it would be good to do so and leave the details as an exercise for the reader? Or are they trolling?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The only way to realistically reduce economic inequality is to push technological efficiencies so far that resources become practically inexhaustible. Maybe in a couple of hundred years.
-
Thank you, Ray Bradbury.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Economic inequality is. The ideal system will keep the fewest possible at a poverty level; but, economic inequality is the result of creating great things.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.