body { -ms-overflow-style: scrollbar; overflow-y: scroll; overscroll-behavior-y: none; } .errorContainer { background-color: #FFF; color: #0F1419; max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 10%; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; } .errorButton { margin: 3em 0; } .errorButton a { background: #1DA1F2; border-radius: 2.5em; color: white; padding: 1em 2em; text-decoration: none; } .errorButton a:hover, .errorButton a:focus { background: rgb(26, 145, 218); } .errorFooter { color: #657786; font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.5; padding: 1em 0; } .errorFooter a, .errorFooter a:visited { color: #657786; text-decoration: none; padding-right: 1em; } .errorFooter a:hover, .errorFooter a:active { text-decoration: underline; } #placeholder, #react-root { display: none !important; } body { background-color: #FFF !important; }

JavaScript is not available.

We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using twitter.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Imprint Ads info © 2023 Twitter, Inc.

Conversation

What's your gender || Would you support the ability of parents to genetically modify their children in utero in order to increase attractiveness (as the child grows older)?

Male | Yes
49.6%
Male | No
38.4%
Female | Yes
6.2%
Female | No
5.7%

593 votesFinal results

7:37 PM · Mar 1, 2018

Replying to

@GavinJackSprat

i wanted to clarify that i didn't mean 'the baby in the womb becomes super hot suddenly'

Vidyamancer Ja3far

@OldDirtyDervish

Replying to

Guess Huxley was more sci than fi.

Replying to

If standard of attractiveness is constant, then I would support it. But, how would parents know if the child would like what the parents think is attractive or if that would be popular in the child's generation?

1