body { -ms-overflow-style: scrollbar; overflow-y: scroll; overscroll-behavior-y: none; } .errorContainer { background-color: #FFF; color: #0F1419; max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 10%; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; } .errorButton { margin: 3em 0; } .errorButton a { background: #1DA1F2; border-radius: 2.5em; color: white; padding: 1em 2em; text-decoration: none; } .errorButton a:hover, .errorButton a:focus { background: rgb(26, 145, 218); } .errorFooter { color: #657786; font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.5; padding: 1em 0; } .errorFooter a, .errorFooter a:visited { color: #657786; text-decoration: none; padding-right: 1em; } .errorFooter a:hover, .errorFooter a:active { text-decoration: underline; } #placeholder, #react-root { display: none !important; } body { background-color: #FFF !important; }

JavaScript is not available.

We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using twitter.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Imprint Ads info © 2023 Twitter, Inc.

Conversation

"if you're ethically non-monogamous i am ethically non-interested" what is this line I'm seeing on Tinder and why do I hate it

14

1

58

@realDavidMoore

Replying to

I am not sure why you hate it. Could you expand on that?

1

1

Replying to

@realDavidMoore

I'm not sure why I hate it either! Something about their use of the word 'ethical,' in 'ethically not interested'. It sounds.... like it's making fun of ethical nonmonogamy somehow? but *how*?

1:32 AM · Feb 20, 2018

Replying to

and

@realDavidMoore

It's an immediate disqualifier, which is ethically questionable, where ethics in non-monogamy are an attempt at being considerate of your partner.

Replying to

and

@realDavidMoore

It's a snarky cut at non-monogamy, suggesting that it can't really be ethical

Replying to

and

@realDavidMoore

It seems like it's saying that being interested in monogamy is as ethical a choice as non-monogamy, which sounds like a given, except that some non-monog proponents are...preachy. That's how I took it, anyways.

1