body { -ms-overflow-style: scrollbar; overflow-y: scroll; overscroll-behavior-y: none; } .errorContainer { background-color: #FFF; color: #0F1419; max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 10%; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; } .errorButton { margin: 3em 0; } .errorButton a { background: #1DA1F2; border-radius: 2.5em; color: white; padding: 1em 2em; text-decoration: none; } .errorButton a:hover, .errorButton a:focus { background: rgb(26, 145, 218); } .errorFooter { color: #657786; font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.5; padding: 1em 0; } .errorFooter a, .errorFooter a:visited { color: #657786; text-decoration: none; padding-right: 1em; } .errorFooter a:hover, .errorFooter a:active { text-decoration: underline; } #placeholder, #react-root { display: none !important; } body { background-color: #FFF !important; }

JavaScript is not available.

We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using twitter.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Imprint Ads info © 2023 Twitter, Inc.

Conversation

Do you have a category of things which are actually perfectly fine and it's 100% your own damn judgmental fault but doesn't matter, you hate them anyway? For me it's couples' profiles on OKC, one of the rare things that makes me wish voodoo dolls were real

14

4

33

also profiles that say 'preparing for the zombie apocalypse'

2

2

13

booo hissss

The following media includes potentially sensitive content. Change settings

View

5:25 PM · Feb 4, 2018

Replying to

“...to learn from, exchange or experience with” is just gag-worthy to begin with. Like, name a human interaction that could not be described that way

1

Savannahsweetly

@SavannahSweetly

Replying to

Me reading that profile

Embedded video

GIF

2

cumrade poptart

@MegawattPusher

Replying to

so it's a bi girl looking for girls to have sex with? why not just say that?

3

@BeneFactumGames

Replying to

Oh, *poly* couples profiles. That's actually slightly less obnoxious than the monogamous success story profiles I was imagining.